Exchange Info: CEX, DEX - gives an indication of liquidity risk. If the token is only traded only on UniSwap vs. UniSwap/FTX/Binance/Raydium there is a different risk associated with it.
For proposals suggesting cross-chain assets with low % of supply currently on Solana, it would be useful to add links to the bridges available (on an āif anyā basis)! Itāll mostly be wormhole, but also possibly renbridge etc! The more established the bridges, the more convincing the proposal is.
When in the process do we quantify the risk profile of the asset? And the proposed LTV?
this is great, covers all the high points and is digestible for most users
i like the idea of onboarding some risk analysts to the DAO to research the risks listed, because itās valuable to the greater ecosystem as a whole and not just Jet
perhaps the risk analyses can link to more granular data for the market minded folks
Do you think we should include to or at least optionally include any significantly liquid dex/cex that list the asset, should there be a liquidity threshold?
Yes, I think available bridges is a good field for when appropriate.
This is a good question. My instinct is that early on collateral candidates will undergo risk analysis after the community votes on them. Risk analysis resources will be limited and gating that behind a community interest vote makes sense to me. Otherwise if the party submitting the proposal wants to include some risk analysis, that would make their proposal more attractive. What do you think?
Some type of liquidity threshold or test. This makes sense, especially if being used as collateral. What good is any collateral IMO if we / the prog cannot liquidate?
I suppose the details are ultimately only useful if Jet does a good job of vetting them.
One thing Iād like to know before giving the green light, though I donāt know exactly how to phrase the question, would be: who owns the most tokens, and what are the lock up parameters?
From what I understand, a risk to the protocol overall is a particular collateral dropping in value too quickly, and if one token had a single very large holder, this risk would be increased.